BLOG

Understanding Multijurisdictional Litigation: A Guide for the Everyday Reader

In the modern era, large companies operate in multiple states and countries, and consumers in one area can feel the impact of corporate practices in another. When something goes wrong—whether it’s a faulty product, a data breach, or a medication with harmful side effects—lawsuits are often filed in numerous jurisdictions and states. This is where multijurisdictional litigation (MDL) comes in. Simply put, it’s when people in different locations bring legal cases about similar issues, often against the same company, and those cases need to be managed efficiently.

This article will delve into what MDL is, explain why cases get grouped together, and break down why it matters.

What Is Multijurisdictional Litigation?

MDL happens when legal cases concerning the same problem—like a defective car part or a data breach—arise in different courts, whether those courts are in different states, countries, or levels of the judicial system (state or federal). This type of litigation can be complex, involving multiple lawyers, judges, and sometimes different laws. Imagine, for instance, that people in five different states each buy the same kitchen appliance that overheats and catches fire. As customers in each state file lawsuits, it makes sense for the courts to handle all these cases in a coordinated way.

To manage these cases efficiently, courts use processes like consolidation or creating what’s known as MDL, where related cases from multiple jurisdictions are brought together in one court under one judge for certain stages of the lawsuit. This streamlines the process, avoiding duplicated efforts and ensuring similar cases are treated fairly and consistently.

Why Do We Need Multijurisdictional Litigation?

1. Consistency in Rulings: Different judges may rule differently on similar issues. For example, one judge may decide that evidence is allowed, while another judge might not. When multiple cases are handled together, one judge oversees the pre-trial process, ensuring that everyone follows the same rules.
2. Efficiency and Cost Savings: Handling hundreds (or sometimes thousands) of similar cases separately would be overwhelming and expensive for both plaintiffs (the people suing) and defendants (the people or companies being sued). Consolidating cases enables lawyers to avoid repeating the same work, like gathering evidence, and saves everyone time and money.
3. Better Settlement Opportunities: When multiple cases are brought together, companies and plaintiffs are often more motivated to reach a settlement, which is an agreement to resolve the issue without going to trial. This is because both sides get a clearer picture of how the cases are likely to turn out based on shared information, which can encourage fair settlements.

How Does Multijurisdictional Litigation Work?

A common way to manage MDL in the U.S. is through Multidistrict Litigation. Let’s say a company released a prescription drug that allegedly has dangerous side effects. Patients across different states may file lawsuits in their local courts, claiming they were harmed by the drug. With an MDL, these cases are consolidated and sent to one federal judge for pre-trial proceedings, such as the gathering of evidence (called discovery) and initial rulings.

How Does Multijurisdictional Litigation Begin?

1. Petitioning for an MDL: If there are multiple lawsuits related to the same issue, lawyers can request an MDL by applying to a special panel called the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML). This panel decides whether to approve the MDL and, if so, where it should be heard.
2. Centralized Pre-Trial Process: All the cases are sent to one court, and a single federal judge handles the pre-trial stages. This centralization prevents conflicting rulings on evidence and helps ensure the cases proceed in a consistent way.
3. Bellwether Trials: In many MDLs, the judge may hold a few “bellwether” trials. These are early cases that serve as test runs, allowing both sides to see how a jury might react to their arguments. The results of these trials can help shape settlement discussions.
4. Remanding Cases: After pre-trial proceedings, cases that don’t settle may return, or “remand,” to their original courts for trial. However, many cases resolve within the MDL, either through settlement or a ruling from the MDL judge.

Types of Cases That Often Become Multijurisdictional

Certain types of lawsuits are more likely to end up as multijurisdictional litigation because they tend to affect large numbers of people across different locations:

1. Product Liability: If a defective product, such as a car part or a household appliance, causes harm to consumers across different states, it’s common to see lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions. These cases are often consolidated into an MDL for efficiency.
2. Data Breach and Privacy Violations: Data breaches often impact people in multiple states or countries. When consumers sue a company for failing to protect their data, the cases may be combined into an MDL to simplify legal proceedings.
3. Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Cases: When a medication or medical device has harmful side effects, it can result in lawsuits from patients around the country, making an MDL a suitable option.
4. Environmental Incidents: Cases involving environmental damage, such as oil spills or chemical contamination, can affect people in different areas. These cases may also be combined into an MDL to streamline litigation.

Challenges in Multijurisdictional Litigation

1. Differences in State Laws: In the U.S., state laws can vary significantly. This means that a case in California may face different legal standards than one in Texas, even if the issues are similar. Coordinating cases from multiple jurisdictions involves balancing these differences, which can be tricky.
2. Complexity in Discovery: Discovery is the process where both sides gather evidence, and it can be complicated when cases are spread out across jurisdictions. For instance, privacy laws may limit access to certain information in one state but allow it in another.
3. Potential for Inconsistent Outcomes: Even with centralized pre-trial proceedings, there’s a chance that courts could reach different conclusions if some cases go back to their original courts for trial. The MDL process helps reduce this risk but doesn’t eliminate it.
4. Settling Cases with Many Plaintiffs: With hundreds or thousands of plaintiffs, reaching a settlement can be challenging. Plaintiffs may have different damages, injuries, or expectations, making it tough to negotiate a solution that satisfies everyone. In these cases, the MDL judge often works with attorneys to find a fair settlement approach.

Examples of Multijurisdictional Litigation in Real Life

Here are some well-known examples to illustrate how MDL works in practice:

1. Opioid Litigation: The opioid crisis has led to a massive amount of litigation against pharmaceutical companies. Thousands of cases brought by states, cities, and individuals were consolidated into MDLs. The resulting settlements have helped provide funding for communities affected by opioid addiction.
2. Vioxx Litigation: Vioxx, a pain medication, was alleged to have dangerous side effects, leading to lawsuits from patients in various states. These cases were consolidated, and the company ultimately settled with many of the plaintiffs.
3. Data Breach Cases: Companies like Equifax and Target faced data breach lawsuits from affected customers across the country. The cases were consolidated into MDLs, allowing plaintiffs to pursue their claims more efficiently.

The Takeaway

In our interconnected world, issues like product safety, data privacy, and environmental harm affect people across borders. MDL allows the legal system to address these problems efficiently and consistently. While the process can be complex, it ultimately benefits everyone involved by reducing costs, minimizing delays, and creating a structured path to justice.

By understanding how multijurisdictional litigation works, consumers and companies alike can better appreciate the legal system’s efforts to manage large-scale disputes fairly and effectively.

The lawyers at Boland Aarab PLLP are here to answer your questions. If you would like to read more blogs like this or to set up a free consultation, please visit our site.